US election officials see a range

US election officials see a range of threats in 2024, from hostile countries to conspiracy theories

ATLANTA: For US election officials planning for the 2024 presidential election, the list of security challenges just keeps growing.

Many of the concerns from four years ago persist: The potential for cyberattacks targeting voter registration systems or websites that report unofficial results, and equipment problems or human errors being amplified by those trying to undermine confidence in the outcome.

Add to that the fresh risks that have emerged since the 2020 election and the false claims of widespread fraud being spread by former president Donald Trump and his Republican allies.

Death threats directed at poll workers and breaches of voting equipment inside election offices have raised questions about safety and security. Some states have altered their voting and election laws, expanded legislative control of local elections and added penalties for election workers who break rules.

The turmoil has added to a wave of retirements and resignations among election staff, creating a vacuum of institutional knowledge in some local election offices.

With Trump running again and already warning that the 2024 vote is “on its way to being another rigged election”, election workers are bracing for a difficult year that will have no chance for error.


National security experts have warned for years that foreign governments – mainly Russia, China and Iran – want to undermine the US and see elections as a pathway to do it.

In 2016, Russia tried to interfere with a multi-pronged effort that included accessing and releasing Democratic emails and scanning state voter registration systems for vulnerabilities. Four years later, Iranian hackers got voter data and used it to send misleading emails.

In 2022, there were multiple instances in which hackers tied to Iran, China and Russia connected to election infrastructure, scanned state government websites and copied voter information, according to a new declassified report.

While there has been no proof of any compromises affecting the integrity of US elections, experts say those countries are more motivated than ever given tensions across the world.

“Election 2024 may be the first presidential election during which multiple authoritarian actors simultaneously attempt to interfere with and influence an election outcome,” Microsoft warned in a November threat assessment.

The company said it was unlikely that Russia, China and Iran would sit out next year’s game because the “stakes are simply too high”. The report said Russia remains “the most committed and capable threat to the 2024 election”, with the Kremlin seeing next year’s vote as a “must-win political warfare battle” that could determine the end of its war against Ukraine

Many local voting offices have been moving their systems off countywide networks to protect them, but not all have. In early September, election officials in Hinds County, Mississippi, were preparing for statewide elections when everything came to an abrupt stop.

Workers in the election office were unable to access their computers for about three weeks. The breach of the county’s computers caused a small delay in processing voter registration forms and pushed back training for poll workers.

Local election offices, especially in rural areas, often struggle to secure enough funds, personnel and cybersecurity expertise. Hinds County Election Commissioner Shirley Varnado said it was a “wonderful idea” to have their election office networks split from the county but would take money they don’t have.

“That should be done, but we’re in a building without heat or air,” she said.

Election integrity groups say more needs to be done and point to a series of voting system breaches since the 2020 election that have resulted in proprietary software being distributed among different Trump allies. They want a federal probe and for authorities to force anyone with copies to hand them over.

They also worry about technical failures, noting an event last November in which some votes in a Pennsylvania judicial race were flipped. The prevalence of false election claims has made it difficult to make valid criticisms, said Susan Greenhalgh, a senior adviser on election security with Free Speech For People, a left-leaning nonprofit focused on election and campaign finance reforms.

“Our voting system is not perfect,” Greenhalgh said. “There are a lot of things that need to be and should be improved.”


Improvements since the 2016 election, in which Trump beat Democrat Hillary Clinton, include replacing outdated and vulnerable voting tools that lacked paper records of every vote cast. In 2020, an estimated 93 per cent of ballots cast nationwide produced a paper record, up from 82 per cent four years earlier.

After 2016, election systems were added to the list of critical infrastructure in the US that also includes dams, banks and nuclear power plants.

In 2018, Congress established the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, which provides security reviews. CISA Director Jen Easterly launched a cyber defence initiative in 2021 and last summer said 10 new regional election security advisers would be hired to work directly with local election offices.

“There’s just been so much that has transformed the face of election infrastructure security over the past seven years,” Easterly said in an interview last August. “In a space where people can sometimes get pretty down, I think we should be optimistic.”

Larry Norden, an election expert with the Brennan Center for Justice, said he sees “massive progress” but also said turnover in local election offices has diminished institutional knowledge.

Just 29 per cent of local election officials surveyed this year for the Brennan Center were aware of CISA routine vulnerability scans, and just 31 per cent were aware of the agency’s physical security assessments.

“There was not nearly as much awareness of the services that are offered as I think there should be,” Norden said. “It’s not surprising, but it means there’s work to do.”


Staffing has long been a challenge for local election offices, which rely on both permanent and temporary workers, including those who staff some 80,000 polling locations nationally on election day.

But 2020 was a tipping point, with coronavirus pandemic-related challenges before the presidential vote and everything that followed: Death threats, a flood of information requests from election sceptics, hostile county boards and new laws that impose fines or criminal penalties on election officials for violating rules.

That contributed to a wave of retirements and resignations among election officials. Utah Lt Gov Deidre Henderson said two-thirds of county clerks there are new since the 2020 election.

“This all combines into this perfect storm,” said Henderson, a Republican. “It’s a real challenge.”

Insider threats – the possibility that someone working in an election office could tamper with systems or provide access to them – poses another concern. To address this, election officials have been boosting security around key equipment by limiting access and adding surveillance cameras.

Meanwhile, the threats and harassment have continued. Georgia’s Fulton County, a target of various 2020 election conspiracy theories, was one of several election offices in November sent envelopes containing a powdery substance that in some cases tested positive for fentanyl.

The letters are another reminder of the charged environment surrounding US elections heading into 2024. Despite all the challenges, Henderson said election officials are doing everything they can to prepare.

“When you have a human-run system, there will be human error. That’s just part of it,” she said. “But we’re working hard to make sure that we mitigate those human errors and mitigate the risks and continually improve our processes so that people can have the confidence that when they vote, only eligible voters are voting, and when they vote, their votes count accurately.”

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *